Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EyeGuy
“To avoid riots, maybe the Supremes will decide that the affadavit of a government official is enough evidence, making the actual certificate unnecessary.”

The problem there is that all the government official says is that they have his birth certificate on record. They specifically avoid saying that the birth certificate shows he was born in Hawaii.

32 posted on 12/04/2008 3:12:55 PM PST by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: pjd

I know that, and the distinction is crystal clear.

But are the Supremes not going to find a way to make this disappear, anyway?

I hope they do the right thing by the Constitution, but I have my doubts.


34 posted on 12/04/2008 3:16:54 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: pjd; TheConservator
They specifically avoid saying that the birth certificate shows he was born in Hawaii.

Which should have been enough to raise red flags to anyone in the 'watchdog' media that was worth two bits...
I understand that these folks often talk in a barely comprehensible 'governmentspeak' dialect -- but when the Hawaii Health Director deliberately refrained from saying that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii it should have set off alarms.
The fact that it has been met with mute silence (other than on a few websites) is another indictment of the enemy media. They seek not the truth -- but how to push a socialist one-world agenda.

45 posted on 12/04/2008 3:22:14 PM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson