If life does not begin at conception, why was birth control invented?
A better way to express that query is to ask, “If life doesn’t begin at union of sperm and ovum, why was contraception invented?” You see, the dead souls have been using abortion as a form of birth control for too long, and we don’t make sense by not opposing the wrong use of language in the issue. Precision is vital, especially now, with a ‘president-elect’ who manipulated language to cancel the Constitutional rights of newly born alive struggling infants in order to make absolutely legal the murder of these preemies as a means to protect the left’s precious Roe v Wade rites or slaughter. When up against such wickedness, precision is vital.
Notice as ‘exhibit A’ the post which followed yours, where a sycophant to murdering alive unborn children tried to play the word game over ‘life’ sperm and such. The poster can be negated instantly with the proper words, for the union of a cell (sperm) and an ovum (a cell from the female’s body), when conception occurs, bring into being a new ORGANISM. The poster was trying to exploit the ambiquity regarding organism and cell or subunit of an organ. That’s the typical dead soul approach and it works because of being imprecise with words. Pricks like that try to sow confusion and dissonance. [For reference, prick = niggling little nettle, an irritant, nothing more.]
An excellent question that bears repeating!