Go back and check my punctuation. I never claimed that “unalienable rights” was in the Constitution, just that you used the wrong word. I then made the point that the Constitution does not give individuals the legal right to interpret it for legal reasons. Individuals do not make laws; we elect legislators to do that for us. Voting determins our laws. Conservatives obey the law, but work to change the ones they disagree with. We do this by voting for the right people, or when we have standing, sue.
Are you saying that if your state bans guns and demands turn in that you will do that?
Yes or no.
You gonna obey the law then try to change it as you just said or not?
From the context it is clear that is what you meant.
That’s ok, it was just a minor boo-boo that anyone could make but with the abundance of absurdity in your other posts today I couldn’t help nit picking and piling on.