Other than the minor detail that he won both the popular and electoral vote by the largest margin in quite a few years.
I'd be very happy to have the SC review his eligibility.
But if they decline to do so, perhaps because the Constitution gives them no specific right to decide whether a president meets the qualifications, let's not forget that he DID win the election.
My personal opinion is that the Founders assumed the Electors would decide whether a candidate was qualified or not. As our system has evolved over time, the College has become a rubber stamp, leaving no mechanism to decide such critical issues.
It is so clear what has happened here. I can accept the results if he won fair and square, but he did not did he?
I am outraged that there is no mechanism in place to avoid this from happening.
If this case or others do not get a fair hearing, then I will have to assume that the constitution is not worth the parchment it is written on.
We have clearly stepped into Mob rule governance. Like I have said here before, the american public has been conned by a fraud and usurper. I will not participate in this fraud.