I'm not an Obamacrat, I have a copy of the Constitution in my hand, and I've only gotten this far on this thread, and so far, I've seen only Constitutional distinction regarding citizenship I've seen is
1) born in the U.S. or 2) naturalized in the U.S., with the caveat of being subject to U.S. jurisdiction. So far, I haven't seen a third category in COTUS or law distinguishing something called "natural born" citizen as opposed to simply born in the U.S.
"
I'm not an Obamacrat, I have a copy of the Constitution in my hand, and I've only gotten this far on this thread, and so far, I've seen only Constitutional distinction regarding citizenship I've seen is 1) born in the U.S. or 2) naturalized in the U.S., with the caveat of being subject to U.S. jurisdiction."
I don't think you are an Obamacrat - I hope you aren't mistaking me for someone else. As far as I can tell, you hold the same position as I do, which is "[that there is no] third category in COTUS or law distinguishing something called 'natural born' citizen as opposed to simply born in the U.S."