You do understand that as of this date no less than six highly accomplished federal judges disagree with you. Are none of them patriots? Are they all part of some vast left wing conspiracy to put an ineligible person in office? Because I cite settles law as to standing, I am attacking good people? If Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito end up agreeing with m, are they all part of this conspiracy or they just constitutionally ignorant?
You are starting to sound like the Al Gore maniacs of 2000.
Maybe you should run for the Senate CC; I think you would fit in.
There is absolutely no precedent for, by natural and national law, a citizen born of another nation to be U.S. President, since that is against the Constitution.
And not sixty, but absolutely no judges have ruled on the matter in favor of a man born as such into the citizenship of United Kingdom.
Words mean things, even when they’re in the Consitution.
You also seem to be confusing citizen with natural born citizen. If the framers meant only “citizen” there would be no purpose for that clause in Article 2.
ya'see it's obama that has left the obvious shadow of doubt...
not sure why any Freeper would be AGAINST asking for a simple requirement in the Constitution to be observed...just seems so obvious...
there has been no ultimate ruling on these cases, and all some here are doing is saying: stop asking, it makes us look bad...
it's really quite sad and pathetic, we get this type of reasoning on FR...must be the GOP version of the PUMAs.