Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeltz25

I am not sure I would call Reagan part of the DC and establishment. From lifeguard to radio announcer to actor to governor to President,there seems very little DC establishment about him. I am not sure he was part of the Tina Brown, Sally Quinn dinner party circuit.


22 posted on 12/01/2008 8:58:01 PM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Maine Mariner

He was part of the Hollywood crowd which is almost tantamount to the same thing. He was good friends with people like Walter Annenberg, George Will, Bill Buckley and others who were very much part of the establishment. EVen in CA he was friends with Unruh and others and was accepted as part of the establishment. He was friends with Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant, Liz Taylor, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and just about every other major star of that era. Imagine a Republican candidate who was close, personal friends with Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington and Will Smith and that’d give you some idea.

He was two term governor of the most populous state in the country.

While I’d agree he wasn’t as much a part as say Cheney, the Bushes, Dole, McCain, etc... he was definitely there as part of a comfort level.

I meant it more in that regard. Comfort level with him and Nancy as people and their background. People disagreed with his politics, but they felt comfortable with him and Nancy as people, they were of their class(if not above it), part of Hollywood glamour, etc...

From the beginning, it was very apparent, to me at least, that the NY/DC media and political establishment looked down on both Gov Palin and her husband as unfit to share their space, as beneath them and as deserving of contempt. I could be wrong but I never detected that personal animosity towards President Reagan and Nancy.

That’s what I was trying to get at. Gov Palin was seen as very threatening because she is so far from what they represent and a win by her would be such a repudiation of everything they believe in and stand for.

There was defnitely an extra edge to the media assault on her and it went way beyond being issue/policy based because on issues she was pretty much the same as McCain who they loved(and would have been perfectly ok with if he had won sans Palin).

I’m just contending that it was more because they saw her as hick from the sticks who didn’t belong in their rarified air in Georgetown and Kalorama and Dupont Circle and Embassy Row than because she momentarily lapsed when asked if she reads The Economist or Time, or because she couldn’t name drop Kelo v New London at a moment’s notice.


29 posted on 12/01/2008 9:22:08 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson