Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: St. Louis Conservative

Fiscally conservative, socially liberal. That’s actually the demographic that both the Liberals and the present Conservatives covet most as they represent the wishes of the largest majority of Canadians.

However, Brian Mulroney made the Progressive Conservative party particularly toxic after the whole “Irish Eyes” fiasco and the Liberals made the astute move of positioning themselves as the party of the centre. Peter McKay did the weak thing and sold the PC Party out to the Alliance Party, thus depriving Canadian voter of an alternative on the conservative side of the political spectrum.


91 posted on 12/01/2008 7:51:47 PM PST by Canadian Volunteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Volunteer
"Fiscally conservative, socially liberal."

I've found that to be a ludicrous, impossible and rankly hypocritical combination. You cannot be the latter and be the former at the same time. To support the latter means to be supportive of highly expensive government programs. Being a Social Lib is not cheap by any means. Conversely, as we've seen all around, you can be a Social Conservative and Fiscal Liberal (all the while claiming to be a Fis Con). Spending is an epidemic worse than cancer.

93 posted on 12/01/2008 8:10:28 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson