To: Nachum
Does anybody know if it’s been confirmed that there were only 10 gunmen? I have been assuming there were more.
If it’s true, the Indian authorities should be in deep disgrace.
I am assuming that 10 gunmen in an American city would be shut down in less than 2.5 days.
18 posted on
12/01/2008 8:50:43 AM PST by
Sherman Logan
(Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
To: Sherman Logan
Don't assume.
How long did it take to catch the TWO in Washington,D.C. ?!
20 posted on
12/01/2008 8:54:59 AM PST by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
To: Sherman Logan
They are saying that there may have been 15. They found supplies to support 5 more terrorists.
22 posted on
12/01/2008 8:56:25 AM PST by
Nachum
To: Sherman Logan
I am assuming that 10 gunmen in an American city would be shut down in less than 2.5 days.Quite the opposite; think D.C. Snipers.
Yes, the conditions were different, but I'd think that 10 gunmen would shut any American big city down for at least as long. The confusion alone would be good for that.
24 posted on
12/01/2008 9:02:24 AM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(Ever notice that Obama supporters chant "O-Bahm-AH" while McCain/Palin supporters chant "U-S-A".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson