I think, madam, before you open your damnable yap to make ignorant, idiotic, and slanderous comments, you ask questions first. I do not have children, madam, because I lost my fiancee. I’m sure you’re well aware of the difficulty in producing children without a partner, unless you’re one who shot out yours asexually or via immaculate conception. I would not be in a position to adopt, madam, since I do not have the health or means to raise children, nor would I choose to do so alone even if I had extensive wealth (since I, gasp, actually believe you need two parents, a mother and father, to raise a child).
What deeply offends me, madam, is that you have no moral hesistation in supporting taking an innocent child, old enough to understand her surroundings, indeed, hijack a child from the only home she knew, only parents she knew, to total strangers living in an alien culture with NO CIVIL RIGHTS, solely because she shares genetic DNA and nothing else. You ain’t shipping the kid from Norfolk to Roanoke, madam. You’re removing the young lady from Memphis to Red China. I’m sure you must’ve been a part of the same extra chromosome brigade that agreed with the Gestapo raid and forceable return of Elian Gonzales not to his father, but to his slavemaster, Fidel Castro. So, please, again, spare me your lectures on how you proclaim yourself mother of the year when you take such an immoral stance. I submit, madam, that it is you that needs to grow the hell up.
You might try to think this matter through sequentially and chronologically, dear sir. It is not I who has strewn this thread with “ignorant, idiotic, and slanderous comments.” You might yourself be viewed as speaking out of your arse on a topic of which you know nothing.
You refer to “.... an innocent child, old enough to understand her surroundings, indeed, hijack a child from the only home she knew, only parents she knew, to total strangers living in an alien culture ....”
The lawsuit was filed when Anna was between one and two years of age. Had the foster family not entangled the matter in the courts, but returned her - as foster parents know they are obliged to do when the natural parents show that they are again in a position to raise their own child -that situation would not have prevailed, would it?
You speak of moral outrage when, in fact, the foster parents did not do as they knew they must. They were not adoptive parents. Instead, they held Anna hostage to the slow and tedious court processes, while acclimating her to their lives and lifestyle for seven years. How does one ‘hijack’ a hostage? If you wish to cast moral aspirsions, and outrage, and take offense, perhaps it should be in the foster family’s direction.
And, please, get back on your meds.