Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Blade

See post 238 for the law on this. You are wrong, wrong as two left shoes.


241 posted on 12/01/2008 8:48:01 AM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc

Post 238 did not include all of the relevant Statute, such as:

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401——000-.html

(g) would cover a situation where a child was born abroad to one citizen and one non-citizen.


242 posted on 12/01/2008 8:55:19 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson