Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Blade

Its real interesting. We have also made exclusions to Chinese born in America in the 19th century. It was called the Chinese Exclusionary Act or something like that.

Here is a site with some info on it.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

Read the US vs Wong Kim.


119 posted on 11/30/2008 7:47:19 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Diggity
Its real interesting. We have also made exclusions to Chinese born in America in the 19th century. It was called the Chinese Exclusionary Act or something like that.

True, but that's an issue of US law. But the law of the UK, or any other country, makes no difference to the citizenship status of an American citizen.

125 posted on 11/30/2008 7:49:39 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Diggity

In the Wong Kim Ark’s case in 1898, the Supreme Court used the term of “native born citizen” to described Ark’s U.S. birth instead of stating him to be a “natural born citizen”. A distinction made by the Supreme Court at the time that would only mean to be Wong Ark could not legally become President.


143 posted on 11/30/2008 8:04:28 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Diggity

In US vs Wong Kim, the Supreme Court ruled that Wong Kim was a natural-born American citizen.

There were attempts to exclude Chinese born in America. They were rejected.


204 posted on 12/01/2008 4:09:00 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson