Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cookcounty
The law that supposedly DQ’s Obama was in effect when he was born, but no longer applies to thise born in the last 40 years. If he had been born 4 months later, he would no way be DQ’d. All this assumes that he was NOT born in the US.

Say what?

49 posted on 11/30/2008 8:12:33 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard

The law I’ve seen cited repeatedly here at FR was superseded in the 1970’s by a further clarification. Yeah, technically Obama falls under the previous law about the citizen mother spending 5 years after her 14th birthday and before the birth of her child in the US, but with Obama being born to a teenage mother, it would literally be impossible to fulfill this requirement.

Was the intent to DQ children of teenage mom’s? or to discourage divided loyalties that could result from spending too much time in the years around the birth in a foreign land?

Obama’s mom DID live in the US five years before, and 5 years after Obama’s birth (with a possible short visit oversas), so the DQ comes because she did not sandwich the “five years” between her 14th bithday and Barack’s birth, 4 years and 8 months later. I don’t think the courts are going to do anything. It’s too easy to wiggle out of this, and wiggling is what they desperately would want.


57 posted on 11/30/2008 8:26:42 AM PST by cookcounty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that's not why the ship is built." ---Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson