It doesn’t even end with acceptance of homsexuality. It ends with the end of all moral judgements over all sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
That is the Sex Positive Agenda as espoused by Reich, Kinsey, and the so called feminist movement.
The slippery slope only ends in the gutter.
Acknowledging same sex marriage as an equal construct opens the door to teaching the “norming” of homosexuality at all grade school levels.
This is NOT about the actions of consenting adults in private. The Gay-Lesbian Task Force has already pushed for an end to the “discriminatory” nature of laws that prohibit people having sex in public restrooms in parks. There is nothing about restricting “the act” to adults or even to keeping it behind closed doors.
Meanwhile the Brits have put a webcam in the home of a heterosexual couple to see that they are “good parents” and have tacitly “promised” to turn off the bedroom cam to give them some “privacy” at times. I don’t hear the Lavender Mafia talking about bedroom police there.
Lawrence v. Texas was a farce weakly “defended” in court by a RINO District Attorney who was later shamed from office. The original arrest stemmed from a dispute between 3 homosexuals. A spurned lover made a 911 call against them alledging there was assault going on inside the apartment. The door was unlocked when the police arrived. The men continued with the sex act when asked to stop by police on the scene (they engaged in an act of same sex sodomy and did not pause from the action when asked so they could deal with the responding officer’s questions).
Since homosexuality itself did NOT carry a jail term, I am assuming that the men were arrested that night for not cooperating with the officers. The men had previous arrest records for drugs and other crimes. The caller was prosecuted and jailed for his false 911 call, he was later assaulted and had a pending court case for that assault against one of the 2 men and was later murdered before the trial went to court (it is still an unsolved murder).
The arrest gave the homosexual lobby a rallying point, with claims of “bedroom police” and from DAY ONE they said they would push to overturn the laws through the courts. I have always been skeptical of the motives of the caller and of former DA Chuck Rosenthal (he insisted that he had to prosecute even if he didn’t agree with the law, yet he showed other areas, like in the case of gun rights, that he showed he didn’t give a damn about what the laws said, he would prosecute gun owners and let THEM appeal their charges since Chuck did not agree with the laws permitting people to carry guns in their cars).
I also didn't know the mystery caller in the Lawrence case had been murdered.
I was under the impression that the Lawrence case was a setup, homosexual-rights groups having already been in court challenging the Texas statute (see Baker vs. Wade 1981, here: http://www.qrd.org/qrd/religion/anti/cameron/baker.v.wade.txt )