To: 2ndDivisionVet
According to Drudge and My Way News:
"Still on board were 25 Indian and two Bangladeshi crew members, said diplomats who could not be named due to restrictions on speaking to the media. The British security guards escaped by jumping into the water, said a news release issued by their company, Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions." If accurate, that does not reflect well on the "British Security Guards" who one would expect (though after their little naval surrender, fiascos with Iran, one only knows) they would be armed? And if so, there is something here that does not compute!!!
19 posted on
11/28/2008 7:15:42 PM PST by
Conservative Vermont Vet
((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Yes, this seems very strange to me, too. Why would you hire three British “security guards” (pretty expensive, I would think) who were unarmed, and who jumped into the sea at the first sign of a pirate attack?
It certainly sounds like those cowardly Brit sailors who surrendered to Iranian gunboats.
20 posted on
11/28/2008 7:24:16 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson