So you had to wait until ‘05? How are those silicone boobs working out for ya? Extra attention, personal satisfaction, increased revenue?
ROFL
FP you can be as skeptical as you want, but the facts remain that you and others are treating the illness of others with disdain.
when it happens to you, or one of your loved ones, I hope they receive more sympathy.
FP and others won't (or can't) address the real problem which is that there are a number of people who just want a safe environment in which to work, and there are people hell bent on clinging to their "personal rights" argument who simply don't care. They don't care if that person can't work. They don't care if they must pay a hefty price for medications that give relief. [Is Imitrex ever going to go generic???] They don't care that that person incurs certain health risks as a result of those meds. [Is anyone else besides me holding back a little information from their physician in fear that the Rx won't be re-written?] They don't care if a person has no other means of income. The only thing that's important here is that FP's right to wear his/her favorite fragrance is not infringed upon. Don't you DARE let the ailing person fight for his/her right to work in a non-hostile environment, whether through company policy or by lawsuit. And that person had better not even THINK of going on welfare and costing the taxpayers anything.
There are only two conclusion one can come to when reading FP's rantings:
He/she is unable to think things through to a logical conclusion, orAs a FReeper, I'd prefer it if the first conclusion were the case. As a realist, I fear it's the second one that hits the bullseye.He/she is a jerk.