Posted on 11/28/2008 2:24:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Many California planning and environmental groups are heralding the passage of legislation designed to address global warming by curbing suburban sprawl as a watershed moment, perhaps the state's most important land-use law in more than 30 years.
"It's a sea change in the way we're planning and funding growth and development," said Stephanie Reyes, senior policy advocate with San Francisco's Greenbelt Alliance. "The winds are shifting, and this is the time to get on board."
But she and other advocates acknowledge that the importance of SB375, signed into law by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in late September, lies as much in the tone it sets as in what it will accomplish, which remains unclear.
Essentially the law, which will take years to implement, uses incentives and requirements to encourage local governments and builders to concentrate growth in urban areas or close to public transportation hubs in an effort to reduce Californians' use of cars and lower their greenhouse gas emissions.
The ultimate impact will depend on how the legislation is put into effect, and whether its carrots and sticks will outweigh the cries from people who don't want big new buildings on their block.
Whatever the law's accomplishments, proponents hope it sends a clear message that will be reflected in future legislation and policies on the state and local levels: Dense, transit-oriented development is a critical goal for the collective good.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Comrade.
Ahhh yes, spoken like a true Marxist.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Not to mention Comrade Ahnold and his Comrade inlaws.
How’s that for an Austrian socialist that rose to power on his Q factor? Who’da thunk a lunkhead like aRnie had visions to change the fabric of the world, for the common good, of course. ;-)
folks don’t realize how they have witnessed a revolution and don’t know it, but they unfortunately voted for it. sure hope they like that change that lies ahead.
This incrdease of density is madness. It will further increase congestion on roads and in housing. Hopefully, the big down turn in housing values will prevent much implementation.
Shadow World: Resurgent Russia, The Global New Left, and Radical Islam
American Thinker ^ | November 28, 2008 | Janet Levy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2139726/posts
Re: California Senate Bill 375
See: Dumb Growth: Trading Sustainable Water for Fools Gold of Global Warming
Link here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2130023/posts
o comments.
Dumb Growth: Trading Sustainable Water for the Fools Gold of Global Warming
Pasadena Sub Rosa ^ | November 11, 2008 | Wayne Lusvardi
Posted on Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:14:14 AM by WayneLusvardi
Economist Tom Sowell once aptly wrote that “there are no solutions; there are only tradeoffs.” This can be no better seen than in the recent enactment of California Senate Bill 375 which will unknowingly trade precious groundwater resources for “Smart Growth” anti-urban sprawl policies. Under this legislation water will no longer be gold in California ; ethereal concepts about reducing “global warming” and producing “green power” will be California ’s new fools gold. It is little wonder that California is experiencing a “perfect drought” with the adoption of such policies.
SB 375 is a piece of legislation which requires regional planning agencies to put into place “sustainable” growth plans. It will require the California Air Resources Board to double the targeted reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that local governments must meet in its land use plans. More specifically, it will require that new housing development be shifted from the urban fringe, where groundwater resources are more abundant (San Bernardino County, Morgan Hill), to highly dense urban areas near public transit and light rail lines (Pasadena, East Bay) where local water sources are patchy and often polluted. The environmental intent of SB 375 is to reduce auto commuter trips, air pollution, and gasoline consumption. However, the legislation will unintentionally result in more reliance on imported water supplies from the Sacramento Delta, Mono Lake , and the Colorado River for thirsty cities along California ’s coastline instead of diverting development to inland areas which have more “sustainable” groundwater resources.
This can be clearly seen by viewing the California Department of Water Resources map of Groundwater Basins in California shown at this web link:
As can easily be seen on the map, the populous coastal areas of the state have spotty groundwater resources while the inland areas have the most abundant water basins to sustain new development.
For example, the City of San Bernardino in the “Inland Empire” of Southern California has such abundant groundwater resources that it has long-range plans to draw down its high groundwater table to reduce the potential for liquefaction (ground failure) in the even of an earthquake, construct lakeside developments, and sell the surplus water.
Even if we ignore for the moment that diverting housing development to urban areas will increase reliance on imported water from the environmentally sensitive Sacramento Delta, the policy makes no sense from even a global warming perspective. Look at the drawing at the link provided below which depicts the geographic profile of the “Urban Heat Island Effect.”
Urban Heat Island Profile Sketch Source: http://heatisland.lbl.gov/HighTemps/
Concentrating housing development in already highly dense urban areas will only worsen the urban heat island effect and thus increase “global warming.” The obvious solution from the greenhouse effect resulting from pollution is housing dispersion, not concentration.
Moreover, by virtue of shifting to reliance on imported water supplies California will need to generate more electricity to pump that water to urban centers located far from the sources of water. No doubt that electricity will also come from imported energy sources outside the state. Green power (solar, wind) cannot be used to pump water because it is too unreliable due to the unpredictability of the weather. Thus, SB 375 undercuts California ’s Global Warming Solutions Act (“Green Power Law - Assembly Bill 32).
Fortunately, the new law doesn’t yet mandate local governments to comply with the plans. No real changes are expected until regional planning agencies adopt the “sustainable communities” growth policies called for in the law three years from now. However, if cities choose not to comply, then state transportation tax funds can conceivably be diverted to compliant cities. That SB 375 is a license for greedy coastal cities in Democratic strongholds along the coast to capture the taxes of inland cities in Republican territory is never mentioned in the media. Environmentalism serves as a cover for politics by other means.
Laws like SB 375 continue dependence on costly imported wholesale water, say at $500 per acre foot (a football field of water one foot high which sustains two families per year) compared to cheap local groundwater at roughly $50 per acre foot.
That this piece of legislation was passed by “Green Governor” Arnold Schwarzenegger without dissent by local water agencies and even air quality resource boards, is indicative of how environmental policy often defies science and common sense and is based on powerful cultural images spawned by government and unquestioned by the media. Incredibly, the implementation of SB 375 will even be granted certain breaks for transit oriented development under the California Environmental Quality Act.
California is shifting from valuing water as gold to a Fool’s Gold Rush to reduce global warming and generate green power. Unfortunately, the public has already bought the fake for the real gold thanks mostly to the media. Paraphrasing a Latin proverb, “(political) hay is more acceptable to a donkey than gold.”
The developers, manifest in their guise of "the state" did all the planning and put stuff wherever they wished without regard to utility availability, flood potential, etc.
That was just one of the things that made life in the Soviet era a hell on earth.
You know that in Southern California every single solitary source of ground or surface water has assigned to it a "water right" which is owned by somebody.
I believe that's the case in Northern California as well, but you can still put down a well on your own land by paying a small fee to the owner of the water rights.
In SoCal, where you have the Northern Neck of the world's most ancient desert, El Gran Sonora, you get water from a pipe or you don't get water ~ can't even find it anywhere ~
Not so. There are plenty of groundwater basins in Southern California. City of San Bernardino has so much groundwater that it wants to create man made lakes with houses around them and sell the surplus water. The San Gabriel Valley Water District could clean up some of its polluted water and be totally self sufficient for water (no imported water from Colorado River Aqueduct or California Aqueduct).
You can drink that stuff if you want. SoCal has enough “local water” from all sources for a population not exceeding about 180,000 people.
Sorry, but I really question this assertion. Given the construction of (or use of existing) adequately-sized reservoirs close-at-hand, this is not infeasible and not all that different from schemes used by some buildings & campuses to use off-peak energy to support their A/C cooling needs, by chilling water at night and using it during the day.
At some scales, differing time-of-generation and time-of-use can be made to mesh, and have. (The Reichstag uses something like this with deep ground-source heat pumps, though I suspect the summer-winter differential doesn't count for a lot.) 100% "green" power all the time for this -- probably not, unless you're massively overscaled. But greatly reduced use of fossil/nuclear fuels, quite possible.
What you are writing about is not solar or wind power but a pump-back system which may be economically viable for very limited users like college campus or a specific industry, not for residential usage. Solar obviously doesn’t work at night when electricity is off peak. And wind blows unpredictably. During the California Energy Crisis of 2001 wind power only operated at 5% of capacity (source: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/aug/02/wind_wont_solve_energy_crisis/). And remember, during the California Energy Crisis of 2001 part of the problem was grid congestion, not lack of power supply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.