[OneWingedShark]

>Voted for Barr myself......looked at the Constitution Party but understand it is full of 9/11 truthers......can’t tolerate that.

What exactly makes one a 9/11 truther?
Would it be the ones that say the government was behind 9/11, or does it apply to people claiming that things don’t fit? (I ask because some things DON’T fit, like the ‘plane crash’ into the Pentagon; it was reported that the impact/fuel-explosion vaporized the fuselage of the aircraft... but that’s a LOT of energy to do that, and the Pentagon WASN’T totally wiped out. So, yeah, that doesn’t fit.)

[FreeAtlanta]

1). The Constitution Party is a viable truly conservative party that has a great brand; The U.S. Constitution 2). If you think the Constitution Party is preportionally heavy with kooks (and the Republican and Democrat party aren't), then lets decrease the proportions and focus it toward restoring the Constitution and our Freedom. 3). The Pentagon is a huge building and it isn't a sky scrapper like the towers were. It also had recently been reinforced on that side to resist smaller attacks. That helped it survive the impact. 4). Do you all really believe that plane was meant for the Pentagon? It barely missed the capital on it's first pass (witnesses at the Capital Building claimed they felt like they could reach up and touch it when it went over), it then banked hard to come back around (experienced pilots know that you loose altitude when you turn) and as it was lined back up with the Capital (look at the impact pictures and what is directly behind the Pentagon) too much altitude had been lost and it smashed into the Pentagon.

If the Pentagon was the target, why didn't they just hit it while flying down the Potomic River?