So they have one “on file”, why doesn’t he SHOW IT TO THE COURT instead of sending lawyers out the yin yang to dismiss it. It wouldn’t even need dimissing if he would send a certified document into the court. It would have been long long ago. The fact that he hasn’t, and has blocked suits instead of just ending it speaks volumes to me.
I’ve gone over this with you before, and I’m not again. When I go in to get my drivers license at 16, I must show a certified copy. I can’t say “I was born on this date. Prove otherwise”. So to be able to DRIVE A CAR takes more than my word, why shouldn’t the POTUS have to do more?
And just because they have a birth certificate doesn’t mean he was born there. Hawaii when it was a new state had a statute (until 1972) that allowed you to register a birth outside of the state IN Hawaii.
The court hasn't requested he produce it. That's probably the primary reason.
When I go in to get my drivers license at 16, I must show a certified copy. I can’t say “I was born on this date. Prove otherwise”. So to be able to DRIVE A CAR takes more than my word, why shouldn’t the POTUS have to do more?
And as I've pointed out before, you produce your birth certificate to the DMV because the law requires it. Show me what law specifices Obama, or any other candidate, must show their birth certificate to a designated agency by a specified time in order to run for president and I'll be out there demanding he produce it along side you.
And just because they have a birth certificate doesn’t mean he was born there. Hawaii when it was a new state had a statute (until 1972) that allowed you to register a birth outside of the state IN Hawaii.
So if Obama tomorrow appeared before the press showing the original copy of his birth certificate you still wouldn't believe him because you wouldn't accept that as proof he was born there. So what would he really, really have to do to satisfy you're curiosity?