Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

This is supposed to be a manouvering reentry vehicle. I guess the downside is reduced accuracy and payload. Current missile defense trackers and interceptors are predicated on a ballistic trajectory, i.e., a missile in free fall after deployment. A little manouver can greatly complicate the problems for the defenders. Of course, boost phase interception (with a space based defense) is probably the best solution. Too bad we aren’t gonna do it.


4 posted on 11/26/2008 4:26:55 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I thought all but the most crude, 1950’s era ballistic missle technology allowed for warhead separation after the boost phase? Only cheap-@ss SCUDS come down intact (unless they breakup due to aerodynamic stresses)?

Russia has tested a technology that everybody knew was possible for countering ABM’s. Let’s see if they can afford to actually buy it.


20 posted on 11/26/2008 7:23:10 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson