Skip to comments.
The Preposterous Premise for Gay Marriage
Townhall.com ^
| 11/26/2008
| Frank Turek
Posted on 11/26/2008 10:16:46 AM PST by Servant of the Cross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: fwdude
none of which addresses the fact that the domestic partner law was not given equal weight to a marriage as people claim.
21
posted on
11/28/2008 10:30:04 AM PST
by
houston1
To: houston1
none of which addresses the fact that the domestic partner law was not given equal weight to a marriage as people claim. No one is implying such a thing, and, in fact, I hope that domestic partner laws DON'T make such partnerships the same as marriage in all but name.
The complaints by the homo-activists is that they are undefendibly vulnerable to contested legal arrangements - to listen to them, you'd think this a widespread, common problem, with partners being smacked down right and left. I'm saying that this is a lie and that a properly executed legal document should hold up in all by the most activist court. We shouldn't be ruled by the exceptions in a society.
22
posted on
11/28/2008 3:26:41 PM PST
by
fwdude
("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
To: fwdude
those who are trying to push for gay marriage, I find are more concerned that their definition of marriage be pushed than they are concerned about rights imho. I mean, alot of ppl dont have a problem with civil union, if two gay couples want to be together with full rights that married male/female have. So why are they against it?
It seem more of a pushing of ones opinion onto someone else than basic liberty
23
posted on
12/11/2008 1:29:32 AM PST
by
4rcane
To: Servant of the Cross
They don’t want to get married, they want to stick a thumb in the eye of Christians.
To: 4rcane
No conservative should fall for the civil-union-as-a-concession-for-marriage trap. Civil unions, domestic partnerships, etc. are just a form of “marriage” by another name, and WILL be used as a wedge to gain the appellation of Marriage by the homo-leftists. Someone on this site once put it very succinctly: Why do we want to encourage bad, destructive behavior at all?
25
posted on
12/11/2008 4:30:58 AM PST
by
fwdude
("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
To: fwdude
I might add that many states, including my own State of Texas and most recently Florida, have included in their Constitutions language that explicitly forbids marriage-mimmicking arrangements for other than natural man-woman relationships for good reason. These states saw the logical conclusion of allowing homo-degenerates a place at the table of civilized institutions.
26
posted on
12/11/2008 4:35:13 AM PST
by
fwdude
("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson