Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Preposterous Premise for Gay Marriage
Townhall.com ^ | 11/26/2008 | Frank Turek

Posted on 11/26/2008 10:16:46 AM PST by Servant of the Cross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: fwdude

none of which addresses the fact that the domestic partner law was not given equal weight to a marriage as people claim.


21 posted on 11/28/2008 10:30:04 AM PST by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: houston1
none of which addresses the fact that the domestic partner law was not given equal weight to a marriage as people claim.

No one is implying such a thing, and, in fact, I hope that domestic partner laws DON'T make such partnerships the same as marriage in all but name.

The complaints by the homo-activists is that they are undefendibly vulnerable to contested legal arrangements - to listen to them, you'd think this a widespread, common problem, with partners being smacked down right and left. I'm saying that this is a lie and that a properly executed legal document should hold up in all by the most activist court. We shouldn't be ruled by the exceptions in a society.

22 posted on 11/28/2008 3:26:41 PM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

those who are trying to push for gay marriage, I find are more concerned that their definition of marriage be pushed than they are concerned about rights imho. I mean, alot of ppl dont have a problem with civil union, if two gay couples want to be together with full rights that married male/female have. So why are they against it?

It seem more of a pushing of ones opinion onto someone else than basic liberty


23 posted on 12/11/2008 1:29:32 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

They don’t want to get married, they want to stick a thumb in the eye of Christians.


24 posted on 12/11/2008 1:37:44 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
No conservative should fall for the civil-union-as-a-concession-for-marriage trap. Civil unions, domestic partnerships, etc. are just a form of “marriage” by another name, and WILL be used as a wedge to gain the appellation of Marriage by the homo-leftists. Someone on this site once put it very succinctly: Why do we want to encourage bad, destructive behavior at all?
25 posted on 12/11/2008 4:30:58 AM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
I might add that many states, including my own State of Texas and most recently Florida, have included in their Constitutions language that explicitly forbids marriage-mimmicking arrangements for other than natural man-woman relationships for good reason. These states saw the logical conclusion of allowing homo-degenerates a place at the table of civilized institutions.
26 posted on 12/11/2008 4:35:13 AM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson