Anyone who so willingly distorts this truth which I have said to you, and anyone who continues to boldly spread scurrilous lies, outright lies, about Ronald Reagan, after correction particularly, and re-correction precisely, IS smearing his good name.
What Reagan signed was an act to allow abortion in only the worst of cases, with discipline and review. I have demonstrated that to you over, and again.
I challenged you to show me the liberal language in the law, which you cannot do, yet here you are, tooting your horn. I explained the workings of the law, and still you bleat your mindless pap.
It is clear that you want desperately to make the point that Reagan compromised his principles, when in FACT, he did nothing of the kind.
Reagan has ever been a defender of Life, and *never* wavered once. And you, sir, for this slur against him, are a lying sack of crap.
By continuing this exercise in futility, conservatives only hurt the cause, not help it. To say Sarah Palin is the next Reagan lessens both her potential legacy, as well as Reagan's. The reality is, there will never be another Ronnie. And it has nothing to do with conservative principles.
The future, however, is bright for Sarah Palin, for she has the undeniable opportunity to redefine American conservatism at a time when it is truly needed, just as Reagan did. Her legacy is still being written. Just think, in 25 years, we could very well be looking for the next Sarah Palin.
But if you are looking for a candidate who you will agree with 100%, you are setting yourself up for abject failure.