Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande
How else do you examine someone for sexual abuse? Or are you claiming that they didn't examine them for sexual abuse?

I am claiming that I never read a statement, article, or anything else claiming that all the minor females were examined for sexual abuse. If you have, please direct me to the source.

DNA samples were taken from all the children.

75 posted on 11/27/2008 11:02:34 AM PST by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Alice in Wonderland; metmom

First let’s identify what testing for Sexual Abuse entails.

Why don’t you check out the pictures and read the text on

http://www.aafp.org/afp/20010301/883.html

It may be a little too graphic for some,but this and worse is what the CPS did to innocent children.

Now from the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services indicating that they performed medical evaluations.

“The HHSC, DFPS, and STAR Health program have been working to provide for all the medical and psychological needs of these children. Arrangements were being made for medical evaluations, counseling, and whatever treatment is appropriate.”

http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/About/News/2008/2008-04-28_chronology.asp

and here

“DFPS had the children examined by health care providers. It had 12 days to produce concrete evidence of specific acts of child molestation.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/post_14.html

The specific reason that the women and children were taken from YFZ was reports of Sexual and physical abuse. Are you trying to claim that the State didn’t examine the Women and Children that they seized for Sexual and Physical abuse? They even X-rayed the boys for broken bones.

I especially liked this statement from the CPS, “On Monday, CPS announced that almost 60 percent of the underage girls living on the Eldorado ranch are pregnant or already have children.”

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/WireStory?id=4753515&page=2

The CPS was obviously lying to try and cover their butts.

“Only three girls were alleged on the record to be presently pregnant, one is turning 18, one refused to take a pregnancy test, so one girl was at issue as to her age at time of conception. Salt Lake Tribune, “FLDS Attorney challenges Texas count of pregnant minors from polygamous sect,” April 26, 2008.”

“A lawyer for the 14-year-old girl alleged to be pregnant has disclosed that the girl has submitted to a pregnancy test confirming that she is not pregnant.”

So much for the truthfulness of your heroes the CPS.


78 posted on 11/27/2008 3:44:26 PM PST by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson