H***G ***C
\** \ ***/
\** \**/
\*** \/
\* /
Are you blind? Take a look at the dashed Tree in A and Tree C. Just admit it, your supposedly water-tight case is leaking like a sieve (just like the rest of the HMS Beagle):
H***G ***C
\** \ ***/
\** \**/
\*** \/
\* /
Are you blind? Take a look at the dashed Tree in A and Tree C. Just admit it, your supposedly water-tight case is leaking like a sieve (just like the rest of the HMS Beagle):
Are you blind? Tree C has humans and gorillas together and the chimps as the odd man out. Only the dotted green line has humans as the odd man out.
If you look at their Figure 5 you will see the proportion of red, green and blue for the sequences they tested. Red is the color that you see, with a bit of green and blue.
Red = (H*C)G, Green = H(C*G), Blue = (H*G)C
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/24/10/2266/FIG5
If you look at their Table 2 you will find that 76.58% of the sequence supported humans and chimps being closest (red), only 11.46% supported chimps and gorillas being closest (green), and 11.39% supported humans and gorillas being closest (blue).
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/24/10/2266/TBL3
Also this places 98% of the DNA they tested supporting tree’s that put chimps humans and gorillas all closer to each other than any is to an orangutan or a monkey.
Clearly your ‘similar body plan = similar DNA” is what is not just sinking but sunk. It never did hold water.