[GourmetDan]

"If you can’t cite an example of a scientific discovery that resulted from abandoning methodological materialism, could you tell us what point you are trying to make?"

In summary, you commit the fallacy of equating the existence of natural physical laws with philosophical naturalism. Now perhaps you believe that generating fallacious arguments is somehow support for philosophical naturalism, but that is only because you lack the critical-thinking capability needed to recognize your error.

That you continue to insist on maintaining your position even after I have showed you the fallacies supporting it merely proves the point that a belief in philosophical naturalism destroys critical-thinking ability.

[js1138]

I don’t recall mentioning philosophical materialism.