I suggest you get the book referenced in my article and read the Mantik section yourself. It will answer your questions. If you could see a recording of Mantik giving his presentation at the ASK 93 conference, you would be impressed, but that is probably hard to find.
Whether Oswald was a shooter or just a patsy is a secondary issue. The main issue is whether he acted alone or not, and I believe that Mantik and others have proven conclusively that he did not. But that just corroborates the fishiness of this whole case from start to finish.
I am a conservative, and I am bothered that many conservatives seem to view this case through a political lense. Truth does not depend on politics, and people who think it does are not really interested in the truth. I don’t really care about the political implications of this case, which is ancient history anyway. I am just fascinated by it. Let the chips fall where they may.
I asked simple questions, why won’t YOU answer them?? You have a website and all and are an “expert”.
I don’t look at this through a political lense, I look at it through a logical, rational, scientifically provable most likely scenario.
I’m greatly disappointed in people who still don’t know that Jim Marrs is a total quack.
You’re fascinated by the conspiracy theories, not getting to the truth, you ignore all the evidence against Oswald.
Can you dispute the facts I posted about Oswald??????????