Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

The DUmmies and Kosacks are on edge right now over the seemingly moderate moves. Republicans could put them in a tizzy if they actually started praising Obama’s moves.

That isn’t to say this is a long term strategy, but certainly only the next few months of the honeymoon period.

I agree about Newt Gingrich... while House Republicans had become fat and happy living in the minority for 40 years (hey, nice perks but responsibilities is life in the minority party), he made a concrete plan to win the House. He said “WE WILL DO X”. In recent years, the GOP argument has more or less been “We’re not as bad as the Democrat”. People need something to SUPPORT.


32 posted on 11/24/2008 12:59:36 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Chet 99
I continue to think that the real danger posed by Obama comes from his Manchurian Marxism. If he remains merely a centerleft candidate, the Republic will survive his administration. The real danger comes from his potentially radical associations, and Saul Alinsky like tendency to establish a cult of personality, a demonstrated propensity to squash free speech, and a proven ability to mesmerize a good chunk of the electorate.

If his Marxism becomes the dominant theme of his presidency, and if it is enabled through converting the Democratic Party into a giant community organizing machine along Saul Alinsky lines, conservatism may well be dead. Therefore, our strategy must be to peel the center away from him, not the left whose psychology is probably immune to our logic and certainly to our entreaties.

It may be okay in a very short term basis, as you suggest, to engage in a little two-step dance to try to separate Obama from some of his extreme left-wing base. But there are dangers in this course. The first is that it promotes an implicit endorsement of his centerleft policies which affirms his legitimacy and makes our ultimate job of seducing away the center only more difficult. Another problem with that strategy is that it tends to reassure the middle that Obama has no truck with the extreme leftists with which we conservatives have been trying to taint him.

I quite agree that mindless attacks on Obama are counterproductive. We must have the right timing, the right issue, and the right spokesman. Right now we have none of these. I think we have to start with finding the right spokesman who should emerge as someone who can energize the party and articulate the three legs of the conservative school, fiscal conservatism, strong defense, and social conservatism, which is acceptable to all flavors of conservatives. He who can unite the party will no doubt be possessed of the forensic skills necessary to carry the fight to the enemy. Rather than praise Obama, I think our job is to articulate our own principles and let the public see whether they are compatible with Obama's positions. As the public begins to learn they like our principles, and that Obama does not, the middle will begin to emerge from its national neurosis.

Meanwhile, we must get busy with a sense of urgency like the country experienced after Pearl Harbor to reorganize, rearm, and prepare ourselves to wage 21st-century cyber/election warfare.


34 posted on 11/24/2008 1:23:12 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson