1 posted on
11/23/2008 11:48:31 AM PST by
granite
To: granite
(Meanwhile, activists continue to comb donor lists and employ the Internet to expose those who donated money to support the ban.)
How progressive and tolerant..
To: granite
Maybe they can just continue to make those really ‘meaningful,’ totally unsuccessful, movies bashing George Bush and Republicans and Christians. They have their work cut out for them, and since it takes little talent — and they HAVE little talent - should be a perfect match.
3 posted on
11/23/2008 11:53:10 AM PST by
bboop
(obama, little o, not a Real God)
To: granite
What don’t these fools understanding about the majority rules?
To: granite
S'up?
5 posted on
11/23/2008 11:54:53 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(I voted for McCain/Palin so I can look my grandchildren in the eyes when I tell them I'm sorry.)
To: granite; All
Yet they call us fascist..
6 posted on
11/23/2008 11:55:00 AM PST by
KevinDavis
(Thomas Jefferson: A little rebellion now and then is a good thing)
To: granite
7 posted on
11/23/2008 11:58:53 AM PST by
Psycho_Bunny
(By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
To: granite
WTH happened to “ The people have spoken”?
8 posted on
11/23/2008 11:59:25 AM PST by
AirForceMom
(God Bless the USA)
To: granite
Free speech cuts both ways.
Conservatism works every time it’s tried, even in places often thought liberal.
9 posted on
11/23/2008 11:59:56 AM PST by
Twinkie
(REPENT! Look Up! The Lord's Return Is At Hand . . . . .)
To: granite
Araki says Raddon should step down. "I don't think he should be forcibly removed. The bottom line is if he contributed money to a hateful campaign against black people, or against Jewish people, or any other minority group, there would be much less excusing of him. The terrible irony is that he runs a film festival that is intended to promote tolerance and equality." Fags, once again comparing themselves to black americans and jews. This is why you must oppose terrorists at every turn. Never give them an inch. And for the homo lobby in particular, never assume their premise on any level.
12 posted on
11/23/2008 12:15:29 PM PST by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: granite
I've got a great idea!
How about some more sitcoms with gay characters?
And how about more gay men on Dancing With the Stars?
That should do it.
14 posted on
11/23/2008 12:17:24 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(I have read a fiery gospel, writ in burnished rows of steel)
To: granite
Never underestimate the left. They will stop at nothing to get their way. The next step is obviously putting people in jail for speaking against this latest demand of the left.
You can already lose your job over words. Jail is next.
To: granite
Meanwhile, activists continue to comb donor lists and employ the Internet to expose those who donated money to support the ban. These people should give this more thought. Acts like this could backfire, causing the situation to go 'hot' at which time there won't be enough closet space to contain them.
17 posted on
11/23/2008 12:35:34 PM PST by
budwiesest
(Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Liberals : 0 for 3.)
To: granite
It’s H’weird that portrays queers as non-threatening, victimized, humorous group. It’s reality that proves queers being violent, threatening, abusive monsters.
27 posted on
11/23/2008 1:40:38 PM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: granite
Blacklists? Gee, gone are the good old days, the golden era, when they only blacklisted communists.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson