To: NonValueAdded
The unions might take issue with his WPA, CCC plans. That is unless the USA pays union wages and the unions get a cut.
Such a tangled web.
12 posted on
11/22/2008 7:21:23 AM PST by
listenhillary
(No representation without taxation! ~~ Mark Steyn)
To: listenhillary
"The unions might take issue with his WPA, CCC plans. That is unless the USA pays union wages and the unions get a cut."As long as the union bosses get their cut of the pie they don't give a sh@t. Did you ever notice when a strike is called those at the top lose nothing?
23 posted on
11/22/2008 7:26:20 AM PST by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: listenhillary
That is unless the USA pays union wages and the unions get a cut.It's already in place. See Davis Bacon Act.
42 posted on
11/22/2008 7:45:33 AM PST by
Walmartian
(Where my pony? I wants my pony.)
To: listenhillary
“The unions might take issue with his WPA, CCC plans.”
Who cares? What, are unions gonna go vote Republican? Ha!
To: listenhillary
Don’t forget the concessions need to appease enviro-regs, states, cities, counties and neighborhood groups in order to get anything done.
Folks will be wishing for how simple things were for the WPA.
99 posted on
11/22/2008 1:12:24 PM PST by
Wiseghy
("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
To: listenhillary
The unions might take issue with his WPA, CCC plans. That is unless the USA pays union wages and the unions get a cut. Such a tangled web.
the unions wouldn't mind....these be government union federal employee building them there roads and bridges..
and for the non union workers
105 posted on
11/22/2008 2:58:38 PM PST by
Gone_Postal
(We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson