Facts and 'modern' forensics do not prove Oswald was the shooter, no more than did the Warren Report.
The car shows that the “magic bullet” nuts were wrong because they didn’t accurately show how the men were seated in the ACTUAL car. The actual car has been re-created in the computer model, how does using the actual car “not line up”?
The actual car and occupants are shown in the actual film.. The computer 're-creation' does not show that reality.
We don’t have to agree that Oswald was the lone assasin, just like we don’t have to all agree that O.J. Simpson committed 2 murders, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove both. We don’t have to agree that Islamic Terrorists were responsible for 9/11 even though there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that they did. You can believe what you want, as for me, I’m 100% sure of the guilt of Oswald, OJ, and Islamic Terrorists. Watch the videos and read my posts on this thread to debunk many popular myths about the JFK assassination. What’s your theory about JFK?
My theory is that the single bullet theory is an effort to prove a politically correct version of JFK's murder..
- Thus the question remains, - just why must we all agree there was a lone assassin? -- Which 'cult' benefits? -- I say the big government 'cult' benefits, not a cult of conspiracy.
You just deny all of the evidence
[ No, I do not. - Much of the Warren Report is factual. - The single bullet theory is not; it is just that, a theory.]
as a conspiracy of the people doing the re-creations of the crime scene and the “cult” of “big government”???
The Warren Report is the governments version of events.. Even the guy's that wrote it later admitted it had many factual errors. - The SB theory is one of many.
You are way, way, way, way out there FRiend, so the guys doing the computer models (a company which re-creates scenes for insurance, crime scenes) are big government cultists twisting their computer model to prove a single shooter? They’re not trying to honestly solve the crime?
I think we can agree that many media outlets have reasons to back the official govt version of events; -- right?
Like I said, you are a deconstructionist and NOTHING will prove anything to you. WHAT IS YOUR THEORY of what happened 11/22/63, don’t tell me that it’s a conspiracy to prove that Oswald did it, I want to know what YOU think happened since you don’t believe the “official cult” story.
I don't believe the official story, - few on this website do, -- about most anything.. We believe in the idea of a free exchange of info in a free republic; -- can you agree?
Your arguments are simply non-factual, it’s pointless to have an “exchange of ideas” with you, all your “arguments” are. “It’s all the cult of big government trying to prove it was Oswald”, by that line of thinking all evidence that points to Oswald no matter where it comes from proves your “theory” that anyone pointing to Oswald is part of the government conspiracy to pin it on Oswald. You’ve said exactly that, you dismiss everything as the “cult” talking. Utterly ridiculous, it depends what the meaning of the word “is” is.
If you’ve seen all the JFK threads here you would know that you’re wrong, most people here DO NOT believe in the various conspiracies and believe that an ex-Marine with a rifle who bought into Marxism, who tried to kill General Walker, saw a golden opportunity to get REALLY famous by killing JFK, and if he didn’t score that last head shot JFK likely would have lived.