Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FocusNexus

20% less energy followed by 80% less energy - doesn’t that equal no technology at all?


13 posted on 11/21/2008 10:47:43 PM PST by Ingtar (For the first time in my adult life, I am NOT proud of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar

In the meantime, global warming, if there is such a thing, would allow us access to much more energy, but the enviro-idiots wants us to go back to the stone ages instead.

Global warming could lead to more Arctic energy

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2136417/posts


18 posted on 11/21/2008 10:58:22 PM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar
20% less energy followed by 80% less energy - doesn’t that equal no technology at all? <

That would result in a final amount equaling 16% of the original, or 84% total reduction.

22 posted on 11/21/2008 11:05:17 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar
"20% less energy followed by 80% less energy - doesn’t that equal no technology at all?"

Ding! Ding! Ding!

Hold the calls, we have a our answer.

46 posted on 11/22/2008 5:11:30 AM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson