Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ggekko60506

They can’t. They don’t have transportation capacity for a amphibious operation of that size, nor, most importantly, can they establish air superiority over the straights even without US Carriers enjoining the battle.

All that would do at this point is result in massive humiliation and defeat. They’re FAR more likely to go adventuring somewhere landwise. Siberia... even India perhaps.


60 posted on 11/22/2008 1:53:50 PM PST by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: farlander

I don’t think the ChiComms would quite do it that way.

Their battle plan would call for a missile attack (purchased from Russia) and air attack to cripple Taiwan’s air force. Then the ChiComms would deploy their fleet of diesel-powered submarines (purchased from Russia) to enforce a naval blockade against Taiwan. Upon execution of this plan the ChiComms would present a political ultimatum to Taiwan: submit or be economically strangled.

At this point we would face only bad choices. To deploy our aircraft carriers in these waters would expose them to devastating missile and submarine counterattacks. The only viable option would be to enforce a counter naval blockade against China in the Straits of Malacca .

If John McCain were President I believe the counter blockade strategy would have deterred the Chinese because he would order it. With Obama in charge I would only expect feckless protests at the U.N.


62 posted on 11/22/2008 2:08:43 PM PST by ggekko60506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson