[calenel]

You know, I am possibly the last Freeper in the world to accuse somebody of being a troll, but you are testing my restraint. You continue to shill for Obama and adamantly refuse to acknowledge any evidence contrary to your position no matter how many times it is presented. For example you claim that a Birth Certificate has been produced when no such document has. What was briefly posted on the Obama campaign site was a Certificate of Live Birth; a document that can be had for a child born anywhere, and even that is alleged to be fraudulent (where is BuckHead when you need him?) The reason no other candidate has been asked to show this document (EXCEPT JOHN MCCAIN) is because there has never been a dispute as to the birth status of a Presidential candidate with conflicting statements from credible persons (paternal grandmother, among others) claiming to have witnessed the birth. If we are to believe that the organs of the state responsible for qualifying candidates are doing their jobs, then how did the idiot Nicarauguan socialist get on the ballot in 10 states (with additional states not putting him on their ballot, so some are doing their jobs). If it isn't important then why not simply produce the stinkin' document?

"Keyes never even asked."

Keyes shouldn't have to ask, the question should already have been resolved. But he has a law suit going in CA, so he is asking in a way. Numerous people have asked and been refused.

"Obama asked the sos in HI for a copy of his birth certificate to have ‘independently’ analyzed and posted."

Can you provide a citation for this? Because it is, oh what was your wording, "categorically false." He could have just instructed the SoS to release it, but instead it was the aforementioned COLB that was presented.

"Add to that not a single qualified person has been refused when asked to see documentation and this is rendered worse that pointless."

Can you cite a single example? Define "qualified" for us, if you please.

It is never destructive or a waste of time to defend the Constitution. If Obama is not qualified then allowing him to steal the Presidency undermines our Constitution and the Rule of Law. Then where are the rest of our Constitutionally protected Rights?

[Oldschoolreformer]

Thank you for the reply, I’m sorry if I am trying your patience.

You cannot argue that anyone gets a colb and argue that Obama’s mom wasn’t old enough to confer citizenship. To do so assumes without evidence that states that do issue after the fact certificates don’t validate requests.

The state sos says Obama asked for a copy of his birth certificate and she says what was posted by Obama was what they gave him.

But are you arguing the colb is fake or not?

You claim Obama hasn’t produced ‘the stinkin document’ but based on what?

The only people claiming Obama hasn’t provided the proof needed to qualify are fringe 9-11 thruthers (berg), fringe third party also rans (keyes), and internet conspiracy theorists (buncha folk here).

I asked what makes you think any of these litigants is entitled to personal viewing?

What disclosure would satisfy the people not ready top believe what Obama has already made public for all to view?

We elect representatives who hire bureaucrats. Name one that says Obama hasn’t produced necessary Docs.