[GodGunsGuts]

I use mostly-atheists to disprove mostly-atheists all the time.

[ZULU]

People who believe in evolution are not necessarily atheists.

That is an incorrect and presumptuous generalization.

[visually_augmented]

GGG: “I use mostly-atheists to disprove mostly-atheists all the time.”

The primary problem with Atheism is that it can explain so very little of what is truly important. Which is startling since you would expect scientists to be the most concerned with explaining the world and all that is in it.

Atheism cannot explain love, emotion in general, intelligence, hopes and dreams, consciousness, and why we are even on this earth (let alone how).

Any scientist that does not ask himself these critical questions is living in ignorace.

[tacticalogic]

I use mostly-atheists to disprove mostly-atheists all the time.

How often do you use exclusively-creationists to prove exclusively-creationists?

[ScoochDude]

There is no such thing as an athiest. They (athiests) are just in denial.