Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: visually_augmented
I believe creation science came about as a rebuttal to atheistic science.

Science, by its very nature, needs to be atheistic- science describes the material world and therefore cannot consider the supernatural.

Science is not equipped to deal with the supernatural or metaphysical. Attacking science for failing to follow the religious tenets of a certain sect or denomination wholly misses the point of what science is meant to do.

35 posted on 11/21/2008 10:53:20 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Citizen Blade

CB: “Science, by its very nature, needs to be atheistic”

On the contrary, true science should not take any stance on whether God exists or not. Anyone who contends that atheism is not a religion (see definition for religion: a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe) is fooling themselves. God and science can coexist and in my opinion, must exist.

There should be no litmus test by the serious scientific community concerning one’s religious convictions.


40 posted on 11/21/2008 11:01:27 AM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson