;-)
Creation "science" is a lie from start to finish. It was only developed when the Supreme Court removed creationism from science classes.
Creationists then invented creation "science" in a dishonest effort to fool school boards, parents, and the courts, and to continue teaching religion as science.
Creation "science" in fact works opposite to real science. It has its conclusions firmly established by scripture and revelation, and misrepresents, distorts, or ignores the data as needed to make it fit those conclusions. That's not honest either.
Sorry, I can't respect that kind of dishonesty.
There, fixed it:
Evolution “science” is a lie from start to finish.
Your materialist co-religionists invented evolution “science” in a dishonest effort to fool school boards, parents, and the courts, and to continue teaching religion as science.
Evolution “science” in fact works opposite to real science. It has its conclusions firmly established by Darwinist scripture and revelation, and misrepresents, distorts, or ignores the data as needed to make it fit those conclusions. That’s not honest either.
Sorry, I can’t respect that kind of dishonesty.
;-)
I believe creation science came about as a rebuttal to atheistic science. The current trend in our schools and universities is to encourage those in the scientific community to abdicate their religious beliefs because these beliefs are “unscientific” and cannot coexist within a “true” scientist.
There would be no need to espouse creation science if there were more objective science taught and less “science religion” in the academic communities. The main issue is that these same scientists are making assertions about hypotheses that are unprovable and calling it a Theory.
The battle field is the hearts and minds of our children in school. If their religion is tacitly condemned by the teachers and school administrations, I would consider this a mild form of religious persecution - something our country’s fore-fathers would quickly condemn.
Kind of amusing that cretin science always turns to materialist science when it thinks it provideds an advantage.
GGG should go back to his strong suit, promoting anal sex.
What about other kinds of dishonesty? Like the kind practiced by the “scientific community”?
Studies examine withholding of scientific data among researchers, trainees
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565120/posts
It May Look Authentic; Here’s How to Tell It Isn’t
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563746/posts