But not so quickly. The announcement was printed within 9 or so days of his birth, and given the lead time with printing and the gathering of the info from hospitals, it seems very unlikely.
Also, if you read the information provided by the woman who found the announcements and researched them, the information came directly from hospitals, not alternate sources of birth.
No, you don’t understand.
The hospital could most definitely have notified them.
The point is, in the State of Hawaii, foreign births could be documented.
The announcements don’t necessarily have to show births only in the state...they could also reflect births filed with the state.
It’s an important distinction. Doesn’t address the proof we’re looking for. I think we need the SCOTUS to settle the matter of proof once and for all.