Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: citizencon; Admin Moderator
He would be an "honorary" one-term president with an asterisk, not a constitutional president. I think I could live with that...for four years.

Your statement above is SO beyond ignorant, it is positively painful. What part of CONFORMS TO CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS do you not understand?

I cannot believe how utterly ignorant about THE BASIS OF LAW FOR THE LAND some folks are!

I don't even LIVE down there, but at least I understand that you have to obey the laws of the land to be CONSIDERED for CITIZENSHIP.

I would logically surmise that in order to run for the leadership of said land, I would presumably be ready, willing and able to produce IMMEDIATELY UPON REQUEST, proof that I conformed with the ~240 year old requirements for eligibility. It's not like they're a POP QUIZ, or anything of the sort...

70 posted on 11/21/2008 12:11:34 AM PST by Don W (To write with a broken pencil is pointless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Don W; citizencon
Thank you!


"I don't even LIVE down there, but at least I understand that you have to obey the laws of the land to be CONSIDERED for CITIZENSHIP."


Is there a trade in the offing?

I'd vote for you, Don. ;o)

71 posted on 11/21/2008 12:18:39 AM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson