Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BonRad
Are you saying this is new misconduct?

That even though this case is now filed correctly at the USSC and is set for conference, it will still not be decided on correctly because of how the NJ APPELLATE DIVISION has written it up?

As you can tell I am not a lawyer. So sorry if I misunderstood.

I understand as of now the SC clerk filed it correctly and is set for conference.

But the NJ Appellate Division has mucked up the process so this case will fail as of now because of sabotage?

If this is new info and not corrected as of yet, how can we Freepers help correct this?

445 posted on 11/22/2008 2:54:21 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]


To: Aurorales
SEE http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2136532/posts?page=1 THIS SEEMS TO BE BEST EFFORT AT A COALESCED “LIVE” THREAD (numerous participants from those below may be enjoining to keep this thread prominent I listings-I COUNT 14 THREADS STARTED ON THURS-FRI-SAT / NOV 20-22): Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm Donofrio Alleges Judicial Misconduct, Obstruction of Justice, NJ Appellate Division Today, Leo Donofrio, also the Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, is separately filing an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatano. Leo will be updating his blog with the official complaint, and I’ll update here as well… Today, Leo C. Donofrio filed, with the NJ Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino with regard to the initial stage of this litigation which was originally filed in the NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division. The case, having come directly from an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is now before the the United States Supreme Court, “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008″ before all nine Supreme Court Justices. I am very concerned that if the United States Supreme Court requests the official records of the case from the NJ Appellate Division, a fraudulent case file - not including all relevant documents - will be forwarded to the SCOTUS and thereby the case now pending might be jeopardized. A copy of the official complaint - by way of a New Jersey Supreme Court generated form - will be uploaded to this blog shortly.
446 posted on 11/22/2008 6:58:54 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson