Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Laws are passed all the times which re-define common terms for the purpose of a narrower or variant meaning within the body of a section or a subsection. See for example "child". In modern legislation it is usual to preface such a section of law with the definition of terms within it. The key phrase to look for is "for the purpose of".

Some random examples:

In older codes and law the variant meaning is inferred from context. Certainly qualifications for the supreme position in government would have more strict requirements, and correspondent restrictive definitions of terms than any other. And in this case such is the case from all historical context about that section of qualifications for the Presidency.
401 posted on 11/21/2008 1:21:17 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]


To: bvw; All
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/ Read Nov. 21 at 3:17 P.M.

It's amazing how many people pour out their hearts on this petition. I've read many that have just found out that they've been duped by the media and had voted for Obama. I think it deserves a recount with all the facts being laid down as they are.
There was a previous poster of a church of African American totalling 43 in the congregration that are absolutely beside themselves with the thought that they voted for him. Unreal that the world does not know about this still to this day!
402 posted on 11/21/2008 1:31:14 PM PST by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson