eHarmony forced to offer same-sex dating services

MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 11/20/2008 | Michelle Malkin

[mojito]

Homosexual "rights" are now indestinguishable from a protection racket.

[EagleUSA]

Welcome to eQueer.

[KarlInOhio]

Would it be wrong of me to suggest that eHarmony should use their advanced computer matching techniques to chose gay couples who would be miserable together?

[Borges]

Couldn’t they just claim that they don’t have the expertise to offer same sex matchups?

[Bosco]

If I was eHarmony, I’d update the matching algorithm just for homos. :)

[opus86]

I wonder what the average Obama voter would think about this? I wonder if they even know about it?

[Reagan Man]

I heard about this yesterday.

Goes along with all the other crap being forced on Americans by the liberal establishment.

All I can say is, what goes around, comes around.

[Deb]

Next stop...dating the neighbor’s Poodle.

[Gay State Conservative]

The settlement, which did not find that EHarmony broke any laws, calls for the company to either offer the gay matches on its current venue or create a new site for them.

EBuggery.com

[Random Access]

Right now, in Southern Idaho, there are some sheep herders calling their lawyers.

[Gay State Conservative]

Would it be wrong of me to suggest that eHarmony should use their advanced computer matching techniques to chose gay couples who would be miserable together?

You mean like matching George Michael with Rosie O'Donuts?

[twigs]

This is an absolute travesty. I can’t believe that I am hearing this in the United States that I love. Why can’t these whiners go out and invest in the research and put together a website of their own that caters to those they wish to reach? They are forcing Christians to wallow in the mud with them. I know. I realize that ultimately that is what this is all about, but it makes me very, very angry. FWIW, I met my husband online in a dating site. It was a freebie long before eHarmony came on line. We’ve been happily married nearly 12 years now. Why couldn’t these people use these other sites like other people have? Like my husband and I did? Government has NO RIGHT entering into private business.

[N. Theknow]

Would it be wrong of me to suggest that eHarmony should use their advanced computer matching techniques to chose gay couples who would be miserable together?

Majority of homosexuals who would use this "service" aren't interested in "long-term, committed" relationships.

Miserable together for them begins with the dawn of the next day.

[He'sComingBack!]

Exactly! Set the new website up for failure. Nothing illegal about that.

[lilylangtree]

Unbelievable! What’s the website address now: www.equeerharmony?

[Ingtar]

Would it be wrong of me to suggest that eHarmony should use their advanced computer matching techniques to chose gay couples who would be miserable together?

From what I have seen of homsexual partnerings over the years, they are ALL miserable.

[kidd]

Its going to be a simple website. It will offer the following for everyone who applies:

====

Compatiblepartners.net has found your perfect match:

[reagandemocrat]

Theodore Olsen?

[Paved Paradise]

A large majority of them are very angry and hateful people. This is what directs everything they do. There are many nice ones but most of them are angry and I should know. I have a gay family member and have spent much time in the gay community. And many of them will even admit to being angry.

[Lizavetta]

This is like forcing a liquor store to carry appliances, or forcing a large animal vet to treat dogs and cats......so as not to discriminate.

Anybody that believes this idiot is anything but a professional gay who is looking for any venue to gay-up is delusional. There's a ton of gay singles websites that he could have gone to and he knows it. This lawsuit was strictly about forcing a non-gay venue to be gay, NOT about looking for a date and NOT about feeling 'discriminated' against.