Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ford4000
No fleas on your spidey sense. In its own write: "The Center for Food Safety (CFS) is a non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy membership organization established in 1997 by its sister organization, [the] International Center for Technology Assessment, for the purpose of challenging harmful food production technologies and promoting sustainable alternatives. CFS combines multiple tools and strategies in pursuing its goals, including litigation and legal petitions for rulemaking, legal support for various sustainable agriculture and food safety constituencies, as well as public education, grassroots organizing and media outreach."

Offices are in Washington, DC (660 Pennsylvania Ave.) and (surprise) San Francisco (on outer Mission Street, in the Castro/Valencia/Potrero/Bernal Heights district, natch).

Its masthead mission statement is more succinct (emphasis added for Rio Lindans): "The Center for Food Safety works to protect human health and the environment by curbing the proliferation of harmful food production technologies and by promoting organic and other forms of sustainable agriculture."

If the clue light isn't glimmering yet, check out CFS's "Food and Global Warming" campaign at the group's website (http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/). Here's a taste: "Want to reduce global warming? Join our 'Cool Foods' Campaign and help take a bite out of global warming by changing the way you eat...." and "...We hope to inspire a groundswell of people committed to making sustainable food choices to reduce their 'FoodPrint'..."

Yep, we'll all starve together when we go. Advanced industrial nations first.

9 posted on 11/20/2008 3:39:25 PM PST by Tenniel2 (Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tenniel2; Ford4000
Further, on that "sister organization":

The CTA (as the International Center for Technology Assessmment styles itself) claims to be non-partisan, as any idiot can plainly infer from the following statement in a March 2007 letter from its Executive Director, one Andrew Kimball, to an unnamed U.S. senator:

"The government continues to expand its investment in nanotechnology’s applications, but has failed to give the crucial social, environmental, health and safety, and ethical implications of the new technology its requisite and urgently needed share of that investment. ... Existing research suggests that nanotechnology presents unprecedented risks to human health and the environment that demand new paradigms of health and safety testing and risk assessment. Moreover, the convergence of nanotechnology with genetic technologies, information technologies, and cognitive neurology biology raises serious new EHS challenges. Substantially increased federal funding must address these fundamentally unique ethical, social, environmental, and health risks while these converging technologies are still in the early stages of development and commercialization. Significant increases in federal funding should first and foremost be allocated to study of these human health and environmental impacts, as well as broader societial issues and adequate oversight development, before widespread deployment of these technologies."

And: "CTA is the country's primary legal organization fighting megatechnologies and technocracies. Using legal petitions, comments, and litigation CTA is at the forefront of the battles to limit genetic engineering, end the patenting of life, address greenhouse gas emissions, protect animals from abuse in research and agriculture, and halt deforestation...."

Watermelons don't get much greener. Or redder.

10 posted on 11/20/2008 3:54:13 PM PST by Tenniel2 (Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson