Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chuckles
Even Darwin admitted he didn't know the "origin" of life, even though that is what his book allegedly explained.

Darwin's book was on the origin of species, not the origin of life.

41 posted on 11/20/2008 9:16:25 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

I have NOTHING against teaching evolution. I think evolution can be proven by simply looking at my children who EVOLVED from the combining of mine and my wife’s genes!

The problem is that the books and the teachers do not leave the “origin of life” out of my child’s science class. In some states a disclaimer was added to the cover of science books that stated and I am paraphrasing: evolution is one of many theories about the origin of life and that other theories included the big bang and ID. These books were challenged as religious paraphernalia. The way left leaning people on this subject are not willing to concede that it is only a theory!

If the teacher and the books simply stated that the origin of life is not known and therefore will not be broached then I would be fine with the subject of evolution (, i.e., survival of the fittest, etc...).

The problem is that most science teachers and books (at least the ones that I had/used) teach this subject as the “origin of life” and fail to mention any other possible theories! That is censorship!


51 posted on 11/20/2008 11:26:16 AM PST by ExTxMarine (For whatsoe'ver their sufferings were before; that change they covet makes them suffer more. -Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson