Here is another reason to play this game.
Just suppose he is qualified.
Not born in Hawaii, yet still elligible.
What if he was born in Chicago or Seattle and dumped with the Dunhams after the novelty of a newborn became to great a burden for a teenager.
His demonstration of not being forthright with his records regarding elligibilty opens the door for the rest of the world that may want to be POTUS.
He sets a precedent that no proof need be shown of age, citizenship, name, or natural-born status and turns our Constitution into....
words.......just words
I appreciate the pings, but I think you should take a few extra seconds to review your posts before you post them.
Your sentences are often difficult to decifer.
“He sets a precedent that no proof need be shown of age, citizenship, name, or natural-born status and turns our Constitution into....”
Yeah - thats what I’m concerned about ... SCOTUS will set precedent under the concept of “stare decisis”.
Stare decisis - Latin. “to stand by that which is decided.” The principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the courts.