Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
If the amendment/revision process were not properly followed, then Jerry Brown should not have let it proceed to the ballot in the first place. The fact that he did gives it the legitimacy of proper procedure.

As to what the court might decide, what are their options? Have any hearings been held yet? Have the sides had their opportunity to make their cases yet? Is the court only going to decide to hear it or not, or can they issue a ruling without hearing any arguments for and against?

-PJ

18 posted on 11/19/2008 12:02:39 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
The same arguments in this case were brought this summer to the California Supreme Court by Prop. 8 opponents in a bid to have the Court remove it from the ballot. The Court turned them down without comment. I can't see it reaching a different result this time.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

20 posted on 11/19/2008 12:05:43 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson