HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE: A SOCIAL SCIENCE VIEW

http://www.narth.com ^ | October 5, 2008 | By Dr. Laura A. Haynes, Psychologist

[Maelstorm]

Many people have heard that homosexuality is largely genetically determined, homosexual relationships are essentially the same as heterosexual relationships except for the gender of the partners, homosexual parenting and heterosexual parenting are no different in their affects on children, and homosexual marriage will decrease stigma and thereby increase mental health in our society. A social science perspective and research review give a dramatically different picture.

Some say it does not matter who is loving children as long as they are loved. I saw a resume written by a male homosexual couple seeking a birthmother to give her baby to them to adopt. The heading was, “Your Child Will Have Two Loving Dads.” An unspoken consequence was, “Your Child Will Be Motherless.” It is hard to imagine the experience of a child who never had a mother or never had a father. Some psychotherapists who treat children of same sex couples are reporting that the children do long for the gendered parent they do not have.

[gidget7]

Ah, but then there has never been such a concerted, albeit it gradual, effort to instill socialist/communist govt and society in the US. This IS the goal, and it will be achieved by eliminating moral codes and values. Think about it, a moral society exists and is successful due to what it promotes, self reliance, self improvement, self achievement, self discipline, religious freedom and belief, small government, no need for social programs because of all these values, all the things that a free society propagates, and communism hates. Why? BIG Government! Everyone eventually reliant on govt, and govt growing by the day because of it. Power.

This is why the left is so intent on destroying values, families, churches, anything that keeps the masses in charge of their own lives and futures. I am no conspiracy theorist, this as all very plain to see. Look into any socialist or communist country, and you see the lack of all those freedoms, and the huge government with most people reliant on them.

[gidget7]

"Sorry - even though I would not love my child any less, I certainly would spend a lot more time worrying about their well being.

Of course you would still love them, because love is unconditional, but...........approval is not. You would worry, as any rational parent would, and I am sure, try to convince them of what was in store for them. No parent would do less, if they indeed love their child. We would never suggest they "safe smoke" or practice "safe drug use", yet we encourage safe homosexual sex activities in school? There is no such thing. Rational people don't think so.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Homosexuals don’t reproduce, they recruit.

They are a fanatic fantasy cult. My response was sarcasm...

[Ouderkirk]

I knew that you were being sarcastic.

But it was fun to call you out on it just the same....;)

[Regulator]

I am no conspiracy theorist, this as all very plain to see

And you would be right.

Gramscian cultural Marxism and the Long March Through the Institutions is well known.

This is the vision: the abolition of the family and of property, total dependence on the state, with the attraction being hedonistic freedom - don't worry, engage in any behavior you want, we'll raise the kiddies for you (where they will of course become obedient droids) if you accidentally have one, you can be an adolescent all your life, we in the Vanguard of the Revolution will make all your decisions for you.

Marx painted this vision first. His disciples in the 20th century concocted the strategy to implement it in places that were "resistant".

So now in California we see angry perverts attacking Christian women on the streets. Could that have been imagined just 10 years ago?

And the Communist filth sit in their dingy offices smiling, because things are going to plan.