Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prunetacos
You don't suppose that Merck was somehow involved, do you?

That was one of the theories that people looking for a "profit motive" saw from Day One. The guy who did that chart, Dr. Horowitz, evidently felt that, since he was looking to make a buck off of the anthrax attacks, the culprit must have had the same motive.

I have no reason to believe that anyone other the Dr. Bruce Ivins was involved.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

24 posted on 11/17/2008 1:59:23 PM PST by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake
"I have no reason to believe that anyone other the Dr. Bruce Ivins was involved. "

Too bad. You said: "...this web site was created to analyze the data related to the anthrax attacks when the culprit was not yet known. Now that the culprit has been presumably correctly identified, what should I be analyzing?"

If you were originally on the right track, you let yourself get switched off by the FBI.


25 posted on 11/17/2008 3:51:24 PM PST by Prunetacos ("Tell Matsumoto to kiss my ass.We've got better things to do than shine his shoes and pee on command)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson