What, pray tell, is “conspiritorial” about demanding proof that the man who is going to be issuing executive orders, issuing orders to our military, negotiating treaties, and signing and vetoing bills actually be constitutionally qualified to hold the office?
The obvious rejoinder is: no categorical proof of a negative is logically possible. The simpler way to state it is that this “concern” is no more than a mirror image of the “Bush is a deserter” bullshit from 6 years ago.
The proof exists. His birth certificate is real. There is no reason to believe its a fake. He’s constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.
I respect your passion for the Constitution, but your acting like a fool.