Posted on 11/16/2008 6:56:53 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[Great work there, PL!]
Thank you much Meek!
Funny!! Gosh, the first time I looked at it I didn’t even notice the changes. Guess I just looked at their faces.
Ok, then how did it happen or are you going to ask, “What happened?”. Not who. How.
That’s a very interesting video.
Thank you; The odds that Connally was shot after JFK are over a million to one, and that’s an underestimate :-)
What has happened is that the “experts” that you and I listen to were suckered into accepting as fact one assumption that is never questioned. That assumption makes the shot to Connally’s back IMPOSSIBLE at Z325, at least per the “experts.”
So the experts have been arguing for decades about something that did NOT happen, the single bullet theory. One of the things that is virtually NEVER discussed is Connally’s turn to look over his right shoulder after both men react to the shot at Z324 or so (that’s the point Connally first reacts to a shot). Connally’s exit wound on his chest was about the size of a baseball but he turns around to look over his right shoulder from about Z230 to when the shot hits him in the back at Z325 and shows no sign of a serious wound to his body. That’s a period of over 5 seconds.
Plus Connally says the bullet that hit him in the back bent him over. Connally clearly isn’t bent over until after Kennedy is shot in the head.
They never talk about Connally’s turn except to postulate that sometimes in battle people go for a while while seriously wounded due to adrenalin....
If you spend a little time, you’ll see that the witness’ strange comments that don’t fit the SBT work in the Z325 shot to Connally’s back. Plus there is overwhelming evidence that I haven’t yet mentioned that reinforces this hypothesis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8_kIDP4EQ0
I see it, too. Coming in from the opposite direction of where Oswald was.
You mean the Warren coverup report?
So, who was it?
You haven’t seen the investigation lies that the HSCA told in 1978 when faced with overwhelming evidence that things weren’t consistent with evidence held by the government (either the HSCA lied OR they are the dumbest idiots on Earth).
That’s the main reason we’re still talking about this coup decades later, and that’s because the “experts” out there will NOT address the altered evidence held by the government. Let’s look at the easiest example:
Several doctors at Parkland looked at the back of JFK’s head and said there was an exit wound on the right back side of the head about the size of an egg to a fist per the witnesses at Parkland.
Contrast that to the autopsy photos held ALWAYS by the government that does NOT show the hole. EXPLANATION: Doctors are lying OR mistaken OR the government altered the photos to hide a shot from the front which would have complicated the “investigation.”
I posted a video from the 2003 40th anniversary shows that were put on the History Channel. Three of these shows were REMOVED and will NOT be shown again. This video with Dr. David Mantik’s comments is rather revealing, Dr. Mantik says that using a stereoscopic viewer that the autopsy photos are forged, that the back of the head views have been altered.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btPXzX1DtJE
So who did it? There’s only one possibility, the person had to have the power to hose the investigation (the witnesses heard echoes not two separate shots a split second apart), the autopsy information was altered, the Dallas doctors were harassed and ignored, the single bullet theory was hypothesized even though it was just as silly in 1964 as it is now.......
Who did it? Watch this video, it is one of the shows pulled in 2003. There are LOTS of things wrong in the show and book that show is based on but at least they finally got the guilty identified (several parts but all are on YOUTUBE).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaWUcyjAeIk&feature=related
Excellent post, potlatch. It’s always bothered me that poor Jackie was used as a prop. She was only 34 years old on that day. On Nov. 21, 1963 nobody could have predicted what was to come, including the expansion of the Vietnam war (nearly immediately), the rise of the radical left, election of RMN in ‘68. The horrendous year of 1968 itself. In a way it feels like the moonbats were set loose that day.
The movement of Oswald was well known - the press was there in force. I'm sure you've seen replays of the television coverage. Remember, Oswald had made several previous appearances at the Municipal Building, including attending at least one press conference. With Ruby's ties to the cops and local reporters, he likely would have had good intelligence as to when Oswald was being moved.
Sam Giancana’s brother Chuck wrote a book called Double Cross. His conclusion is consistent with yours. Excellent book.
It’s fascinating, even so many years after the event.
Actually this story is better than any fiction.
The VP and FBI Director conspire to kill the President and cover up the killing with a charade called the Warren Commission. Many things went wrong such as Oswald was not killed in the theater after “he” killed a cop (did you know there was a witness who said JACK RUBY was in the theater when Oswald was arrested?).
There’s a credible witness (newspaper reporter) who said that Jack Ruby was at Parkland, the orderly who found CE399 (magic bullet) said he found the bullet on a stretcher NOT connected to the case....
Ruby screwed up and had to kill Oswald or else the whole charade would have fallen apart. Oswald was no dummy.
The press buys into the Warren Commission fairy tales and will not back off even though.....
ETC ETC.
This story is probably the biggest one ever, the Government can’t let you know that a murderer from Texas killed JFK and they are NOT going to let you know.
The truth?
They (the press and the government) are not going to tell you. The consequences are still serious even to this day.
This story is not a mystery, it’s a secret, a secret that the public can’t ever find out....
Thanx, Didn’t know about that book. That’s why I’m in the witless protection program.
LOL, modern forensics show just how wrong this was.
Lol, and knowing you I’ll bet you have that book right at hand!
If you read enough on the subject what you’ve noted it obvious. He was an odd ball and even the Soviets recognized it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.